BLOG

The Real Cost of a Full-Time U.S. Employee in 2025 (The Number Will Surprise You)

That $70,000 salary you're paying isn't $70,000. When you add benefits, taxes, overhead, and turnover, the real number is closer to $113,000. Here's the complete breakdown — and what smart companies are doing about it.

The Number Most Business Owners Get Wrong

When a hiring manager says they're paying someone $70,000 a year, they're describing the salary. They're not describing the cost. The real, fully-loaded cost of a $70,000 U.S. employee is closer to $95,000–$115,000 per year when you account for every dollar that employee actually costs the business.

The Full Cost Breakdown

Payroll Taxes (Employer Portion)

Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), federal unemployment (~0.6%), and state unemployment (typically 2–4%). Total: approximately $6,500–$8,500 per year on a $70,000 salary.

Health Insurance

Employer contributions averaged $7,911 per year for single coverage in 2024, per the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Paid Time Off

The average U.S. employee receives 15 days PTO plus 10 holidays, roughly 10% of the work year where you're paying salary with no corresponding output. On $70,000, that's approximately $7,000 in paid non-working time.

Equipment, Office Space, and Overhead

Laptop, software licenses, office space (at $25–$40/sqft), plus recruiting and training costs. Conservatively $5,000–$8,000 per year.

Turnover Costs

SHRM estimates replacing an employee costs 50–200% of annual salary. At the industry-average tenure of 4.1 years, that's an annualized turnover cost of $8,500–$34,000, spread invisibly across operations.

The Real Total

Adding it up conservatively: a $70,000 salary employee costs approximately $113,000 per year in total. The multiplier is consistently 1.5–1.7x base salary for most professional roles.

What This Means for Your Growth Strategy

Every time you add a U.S.-based execution professional (coordinator, bookkeeper, analyst, or specialist) you're committing $75,000–$120,000 per year in fully-loaded cost.

If that professional is doing work that doesn't require physical U.S. presence or local licensure, you have an alternative: a dedicated global professional at $22,000–$28,000 per year, fully managed, working your hours, in your systems. You're also eliminating the HR burden, payroll processing, benefits administration, and recruiting cost when you need to replace someone.

Where Global Staffing Makes Sense

Senior leadership, client-facing relationship roles, field-based positions, and roles requiring local licensing are typically better filled domestically. But for the execution layer (coordinators, specialists, analysts, bookkeepers, and support professionals), the case for global staffing is compelling and the ROI is immediate.

The companies growing fastest today are intentional about which roles belong in which column, allocating their domestic budget toward the people who genuinely need to be there. Revaya offers a free 30-minute consultation to map out what's possible for your specific team structure.

Once you're logged back in, let me know and I'll try again automatically — or you can paste the above directly. I'll also have Blog 4 (Remote Bookkeeping) ready for you.

Try Revaya Risk-Free

No Contracts, No Commitments. Guaranteed Results.

BLOG

Read More Blogs

How to Set Up Systems for a Global Team Member to Succeed on Day One

Adding a global professional to your team is one of the smartest staffing decisions a growing U.S. company can make. But without the right systems in place before they start, even the best hire will struggle to deliver results. Here is how to get it right from the beginning.

Read More
The Hidden Costs of U.S.-Only Hiring (And What to Do Instead)

Most U.S. companies only calculate salary when budgeting for a new hire. But the true cost of a domestic employee goes far beyond the paycheck — and it's eating into your margins more than you think. Here's how smart companies are rethinking their hiring strategy.

Read More
Remote Staffing Agency vs. Recruiting Partner: Understanding the Real Difference

Most companies evaluating global staffing think they're choosing between vendors. They're actually choosing between fundamentally different operating models—with very different outcomes. Here's what separates a remote staffing agency from a genuine recruiting and HR partner.

Read More
Managing a Global Team: 5 Things U.S. Companies Get Wrong (And How to Fix Them)

Building a global team is the easy part. Managing one effectively is where most U.S. companies fall short—not because the global model doesn't work, but because they apply domestic management assumptions to a fundamentally different context. Here are the five most common mistakes and how to avoid them.

Read More

Get Insider Access!

Join our weekly Revaya digest and be the first to know about new positions and latest industry trends.